A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM Scares Me?

Why PLM Scares Me?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Following my previous post about how PLM can go to mainstream, I had chance to discuss this topic with some of my colleagues. We came to some initial conclusions that I’d like to share with my blog readers. Let me put upfront some assumption with regards to main trends I see happens in computer industry and enterprise software.

One of them is a trend for “simplicity”.  This is the biggest trend I see across many of the software systems during the past years. In my view, Google is staying first in the line and promoting the most simple user experience ever – single line. Following Google, I can mention Apple with their multiple products, also promoting simple approach. Almost in an enterprise software world, I can mention Microsoft SharePoint approach, as something maybe not very simple, but definitely less complex comparing to everything else you see around. So, my conclusion is that simplicity created strong trend toward user acceptance and understanding.

At the same time, Product Lifecycle Management became mature and prove success in companies and industries. The strategy of PLM was to move toward ability to support overall product lifecycle and because of that, PLM wanted to gather more and more processes, information, connection with other systems and people interaction. As a consequence of this PLM came to “maturity phase” and… overcomplicating. We got a system that can be deployed in global organizations, manage complex product structures, organization processes, supply chain and more. However, obvious price was big and complicated environment.

So, what happened as a result. Two trends “simplicity” and “PLM maturity” had actually different directions. User demands for simple and elegant solutions came in conflict with mature and complicated PLM deployments. What solution do I see for this situation? In my view, PLM providers understood situation and their immediate answer for short term was as following: 1/best practices; 2/industry approach; 3/education. We had chance to see these trends in strategies of all PLM providers. Would you ask me – is it enough? No, I don’t think so. I think a current “state of the art PLMs” are scaring users and prevent PLM from mainstream deployment.

Just my opinion.

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 June, 2009

I was thinking about future options for PLM in today’s computing environment. In this fast moving world, there are two...

22 October, 2021

Technologies are simple, but people are hard. I’ve heard this phrase from somebody more than a decade ago and I...

15 August, 2018

Digital transformation is key initiative for many organizations these days. Every organization these days understands that there is no alternative...

28 August, 2017

If you follow Siemens PLM Solid Edge, you might noticed another turn in a history of data management (PDM) development....

30 June, 2014

CAD data is a core and one of the most fundamental parts of every manufacturing design. It all starts and...

26 January, 2014

Differentiation. Competitive advantage. Value sales. I’m sure you’ve heard these buzzwords many times. Competition is part of everyday business life....

19 August, 2009

I’m constantly looking for new technologies and perspectives of PLM improvement. For the last time, we discussed many products and...

15 March, 2010

Content is a King. If you create valuable content in your app, you can do whatever you want. Since everybody...

1 April, 2016

PLM software is hard to interact with. I think the hardest part is PLM workflows. Usually very sophisticated it creates...

Blogroll

To the top