A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM Scares Me?

Why PLM Scares Me?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Following my previous post about how PLM can go to mainstream, I had chance to discuss this topic with some of my colleagues. We came to some initial conclusions that I’d like to share with my blog readers. Let me put upfront some assumption with regards to main trends I see happens in computer industry and enterprise software.

One of them is a trend for “simplicity”.  This is the biggest trend I see across many of the software systems during the past years. In my view, Google is staying first in the line and promoting the most simple user experience ever – single line. Following Google, I can mention Apple with their multiple products, also promoting simple approach. Almost in an enterprise software world, I can mention Microsoft SharePoint approach, as something maybe not very simple, but definitely less complex comparing to everything else you see around. So, my conclusion is that simplicity created strong trend toward user acceptance and understanding.

At the same time, Product Lifecycle Management became mature and prove success in companies and industries. The strategy of PLM was to move toward ability to support overall product lifecycle and because of that, PLM wanted to gather more and more processes, information, connection with other systems and people interaction. As a consequence of this PLM came to “maturity phase” and… overcomplicating. We got a system that can be deployed in global organizations, manage complex product structures, organization processes, supply chain and more. However, obvious price was big and complicated environment.

So, what happened as a result. Two trends “simplicity” and “PLM maturity” had actually different directions. User demands for simple and elegant solutions came in conflict with mature and complicated PLM deployments. What solution do I see for this situation? In my view, PLM providers understood situation and their immediate answer for short term was as following: 1/best practices; 2/industry approach; 3/education. We had chance to see these trends in strategies of all PLM providers. Would you ask me – is it enough? No, I don’t think so. I think a current “state of the art PLMs” are scaring users and prevent PLM from mainstream deployment.

Just my opinion.

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 April, 2013

Technological predictions are tough and nobody wants to make them. Back in 2010, I came with the following post –...

25 March, 2019

During the last decade, we’ve seen the establishment of new business models in software. I checked my blog about future...

27 March, 2009

Continuing the discussion about cloud-based implementation of PLM, I started to think about the relationship between current PLM products and...

30 January, 2025

I’m preparing for 3DEXPERIENCE World 2025, which will take place in Houston, TX, in a few weeks. For many years,...

18 February, 2010

I’d like to put some thoughts about user identity management in the enterprise. In the beginning, you may think the topic...

24 April, 2009

I’m getting back to the topic of persistent storage of PLM data. In my previous posts, I touched on this...

5 December, 2014

One of the topics I touched in my yesterday post about future PLM platforms is platform migration. The ability of customer...

17 November, 2020

It is hard to swim these days in the ocean of online events. PLM is not an exclusion. And it...

5 October, 2010

The following blog article drove my attention yesterday: CAD File Management ≠ PLM. The short blog post published by Peter...

Blogroll

To the top