A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM Scares Me?

Why PLM Scares Me?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Following my previous post about how PLM can go to mainstream, I had chance to discuss this topic with some of my colleagues. We came to some initial conclusions that I’d like to share with my blog readers. Let me put upfront some assumption with regards to main trends I see happens in computer industry and enterprise software.

One of them is a trend for “simplicity”.  This is the biggest trend I see across many of the software systems during the past years. In my view, Google is staying first in the line and promoting the most simple user experience ever – single line. Following Google, I can mention Apple with their multiple products, also promoting simple approach. Almost in an enterprise software world, I can mention Microsoft SharePoint approach, as something maybe not very simple, but definitely less complex comparing to everything else you see around. So, my conclusion is that simplicity created strong trend toward user acceptance and understanding.

At the same time, Product Lifecycle Management became mature and prove success in companies and industries. The strategy of PLM was to move toward ability to support overall product lifecycle and because of that, PLM wanted to gather more and more processes, information, connection with other systems and people interaction. As a consequence of this PLM came to “maturity phase” and… overcomplicating. We got a system that can be deployed in global organizations, manage complex product structures, organization processes, supply chain and more. However, obvious price was big and complicated environment.

So, what happened as a result. Two trends “simplicity” and “PLM maturity” had actually different directions. User demands for simple and elegant solutions came in conflict with mature and complicated PLM deployments. What solution do I see for this situation? In my view, PLM providers understood situation and their immediate answer for short term was as following: 1/best practices; 2/industry approach; 3/education. We had chance to see these trends in strategies of all PLM providers. Would you ask me – is it enough? No, I don’t think so. I think a current “state of the art PLMs” are scaring users and prevent PLM from mainstream deployment.

Just my opinion.

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 October, 2010

I read a blog post by Stephen Porter of Zero Wait State called – The PLM State: Why can’t we...

28 September, 2009

Short prompt in the beginning of the week. I was reading post from BSW “Killer Ideas And Controlled Innovation: Why...

6 September, 2010

I decided to make an unusual post today. Because of holiday (Labor Day in USA), I spent most of the...

23 February, 2010

I had chance to read yesterday Arena’s whitepaper “Whose BOM is it Anyway?”. You can find the link this whitepaper...

25 January, 2020

PLM is often called a journey. Once started, the PLM solution is evolving and changing. The paradigm of a journey...

17 November, 2019

It’s that time of the PLM development again – vendors have started to pay attention to small and medium-sized manufacturing...

3 February, 2011

Yesterday morning Google held an event presenting Android Honecomb – a new operational system completely focused on Tablet devices. Navigate...

5 October, 2016

Centralization was a big deal in manufacturing 100 years ago. Famous River Rouge Factory was a giant plant that literally took...

3 December, 2022

PLM adoption is hard. The history of PLM projects start as engineering projects and, unfortunately, struggles with many aspects related...

Blogroll

To the top