A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?

PLM Processes: Flowchart vs. Rule-based?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Process management is an important aspect and activity in Product Lifecycle Management. Multiple activities in product design, engineering and manufacturing can be defined and maintained as a process. Definition of a process is an interesting problem, in my view. Different systems are using multiple techniques to define processes. Most of them are traditionally workflow-oriented. If you talk to engineers in an organization, you will discover that flowchart is widely used way to define a process. You can see below few examples of such a workflows.

We can find such definitions in all PDM/PLM systems. Definition of processes done in this way is very straightforward. However, when processes become complicated, the overall definition of a process can become a bit complicated too. You can see one of the examples below.

At the same time, definition of processes can be done verbally as a set of written rules. Such a workflow definition can be done much easier and can be easy read and interpreted by people involved into people definition. You can see a simple example of such definition created on the whiteboard.

I found both practices implemented in SharePoint Designer 2010. You can find similar implementation in other business process management systems. However, I found MS SharePoint case as a very representative one. You can create flow-based process definition using MS Visio based flowcharts.

At the same time, you can use a very interesting implementation of rule-based processes. I found such rule-based definition of processes as something that can be easier understood by users.

What is my conclusion? The ability easy to define a process is very critical. Process definition is one of the most complicated parts of PLM system implementation. To have a tool that allows you easy to understand and define processes can become an important competitive advantage for any PLM system. I think, systems are evolving and create new ways to implement processes. It will be interesting to hear what are your practices and experience in this space. I’m looking forward to you feedback and discussion.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 January, 2011

Hi Everyone. I never posted New Year Resolution before. However, I decided to make this change and post Beyond PLM...

23 January, 2019

Digital transformation is a new darling of technological marketing PLM. It is promising to transform processes and organize data and...

14 September, 2018

Earlier this week, I shared my perspective on cloud adoption in 2018, challenges of single tenant PLM architectures and differences between...

22 January, 2016

Old concepts are sticky. Think about QUERTY keyboard. It was designed almost 150 years ago with a special reason –...

26 September, 2010

COFES Russia is a history now. I wanted to put some thoughts and links for non-Russian speaking readers about what...

21 July, 2010

I read MCADCafe article – PLMIG announces a 10-Year PLM Industry Vision. It navigates you to PLM IG (Interest Group) where...

27 July, 2017

There are different levels of PLM implementation complexity – long planning, budget overrun, customization delays. Tons of articles are written...

22 June, 2020

PLM industry has a new marketing darling – SaaS. It was just two weeks ago when I shared news about...

12 February, 2015

There is a growing number of discussions related to  “platformization” in PLM. Few weeks ago I had a chance to...

Blogroll

To the top