A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 July, 2010

Data management is boring. Data, Numbers, Tables… Even, if I completely disagree, I guess lots of people think so. Nevertheless, even...

18 September, 2017

When you present about “cloud” and “PLM” topic, the question of security was always the one on the top.For many...

24 April, 2018

I’m in Las Vegas at SuiteWorld 2018. Annual event organized by Oracle NetSuite – one of the largest cloud ERP...

22 May, 2013

Collaboration. Magic and one of the most confusing words. People are using it in so many contexts that it became...

27 January, 2011

Almost two years ago, I published the following post – Virtual World: Where is the boarder between game and PLM...

3 July, 2009

Prompt – do you think we are going to have free Project Management tools? Is it next possible Google App?...

9 April, 2015

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you...

17 July, 2019

Some of my PLM friends like to say – PLM is a journey and not some kind of software. Well,...

8 January, 2014

There is no person in manufacturing universe that can underestimate the importance of right Bill of Material information. However, I...

Blogroll

To the top