A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 August, 2016

“Single version of truth” is one of the most popular paradigm developed by PLM vendors for the last 10-15 years....

1 June, 2012

Let me start today from asking you a question. How do you run your company? Regardless on size, scale and...

14 February, 2012

Monday was my second day in San-Diego. SolidWorks World 2012 was officially launched with general session with presentations of SolidWorks...

1 November, 2011

The last week snow in Boston was kind of an event. I think, many of New England residents are still...

5 May, 2017

While PLM vendors are still looking how to differentiate their strategies, PLM software is still crazy expensive. Manufacturing companies will...

23 May, 2013

Office and other productivity tools are un-separateable parts of product development environment. Some of them such Microsoft Excel literally can...

30 August, 2009

Short note this Sunday. Take a look on a very interesting blind test site comparing different search engines – Bing...

27 June, 2019

I grew up in the Soviet Union at the time when the planet was going through The Soviet-American Arms Race,...

13 January, 2018

One of my ‘burning questions” for PLM in 2018 is about value of data. Check my article (here). What PLM...

Blogroll

To the top