A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open PLM – A Climb For Losers?

Open PLM – A Climb For Losers?
Oleg
Oleg
8 July, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Almost two months ago, I had chance to read a blog article by Mobile Beat with some intriguing name “Open is for losers” by Dave McClure. Take a look and form your opinion. Understanding the overall intention to provoke a good discussion around this topic, I decided to follow this blog post in some time to read discussion and see people’s opinion on this topic. It happened that independently some of PLM Think Tank posts generated some interesting discussion related to the topic of Openness.

Closed Thoughts About PLM Openness

Open vs. Closed PLM Debates

Today, I want to get back and discuss how I see the future of openness in PLM and Engineering Software.

Standards, Formats, Data Models

The discussion about standards and formats is life long. Do you think CAD and PLM industry will be able to generate a reasonable quality standard answering to the needs of industry? Discussions in this field are varying from request to develop independent formats and ends up by requests to disclosure existing data models, formats, etc. I don’t think these discussions may produce results in near future. The development of common formats and models is too expensive and, in the end, will require to have a set of tools to work with. The interesting potential will be to borrow some of the emerging web technologies.

APIs, Toolkits and Platforms

API is the most referenced way to make software open. Combined with a set of patterns, technologies and buzzwords, this is probably the way to do it in real life. The biggest remaining problem in this space is reliability and compliance of these APIs within the time. In addition, APIs and other internal mechanisms are under heavy licensing by vendors. I don’t see any silver bullet these days that can make any major improvements in this space.

Applications and Solutions

The reality of a current situation is that customers are working with multiple applications, products and solutions. In many situations, I can see no interest for a particular vendor to enable easy data migration from one tool to another. Therefore, we can see multiple software vendors or service providers that can help customers to solve this problem.

What is my conclusion today? How To Climb To Open PLM? This is the most important question that needs to be asked collectively in the industry. I think, the industry movement into PLM openness is the indicator of industry maturity. I can see ups and downs on this road. A critical mass of openness needs to be delivered by vendors to turn on the switch of benefits from open PLM. Multiple established vendors and newcomers will need to invest enough resources to make it happen. The remaining players will be able to deliver better solutions. Some of them can probably die on the road. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 May, 2019

Every CAD system is using so-called geometric modeling kernel – 3D modeling component. If you want to know what 3D...

22 December, 2010

Google Wave gone. Developers moved to Facebook. Nevertheless, Google comes with an interesting Labs project Google Shared Space. You can...

2 May, 2012

The first day of ACE 2012 was quite energetic. This is my 3rd year at Aras Community Event. The first...

28 June, 2010

In the landscape of PLM, collaboration is overused word. You can hear “collaborative” a lot, and you’d be thinking all...

3 June, 2010

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing...

12 December, 2013

Identification. When it comes to data management it is a very important thing. In product data management and PLM it...

29 March, 2013

For many years the business model of CAD, PDM and later PLM vendors was structured as high upfront license combined...

12 September, 2009

Web is coming to every place. I think in retrospective and see web as a next big change in the...

12 July, 2019

Steve Porter’s article Best in Show- Can ERP Providers do PLM? is a throwback in the mood of thinking about...

Blogroll

To the top