A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 June, 2012

PLM is not for small companies. It was a typical statement popular 10 years ago. Smaller manufacturing company is a...

28 March, 2017

For the last few years PLM vendors made a big step towards acceptance of cloud technology, SaaS application and subscription...

23 April, 2023

As the manufacturing industry continues its digital transformation journey, Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems are becoming more critical for industrial...

28 February, 2012

You are probably familiar with the following statements “beavers do what beavers do“. I’ve got the confirmation of that last...

10 November, 2020

Small and medium-sized organizations are very interesting. Their problems are very much similar to the problems of large companies, but...

21 March, 2011

One of my blog readers shared with me slides of Paul Saunders presentation about MRO software from the Miami Aircraft...

1 June, 2016

I remember first time I was introduced to AutoLISP. It was many years ago, but I can still recall how...

7 March, 2018

CIMdata announced new research completion about PLM Status and trends. A quick note about it can be found here. A...

21 April, 2016

Business environment is changing fast these days. For years, enterprise and manufacturing were very slow moving segments. Long production programs,...

Blogroll

To the top