A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 August, 2024

The shift to SaaS PLM is rapidly gaining traction in the manufacturing and engineering sectors. As companies move away from...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

6 March, 2009

I’ve been thinking about how a company can use business process tools to manage their processes. In one of my...

8 July, 2010

Almost two months ago, I had a chance to read a blog article by Mobile Beat with some intriguing name...

7 July, 2016

Earlier this year I shared some of my thoughts how machine learning can be used to improve the quality and...

8 May, 2019

I attended the Digital Factory 2019 event yesterday in Boston organized by Formlabs. The event took place in Boston Cruise...

7 May, 2010

You can find this post as something unusual. I decided to jump in my PLM Think Tank Time Machine in…...

23 June, 2010

I had chance to have a talk with David Siegel, entrepreneur, speaker and the author of a new book “Pull“....

10 December, 2011

One of the biggest problem I can see in all PDM / PLM tools is a high level of the...

Blogroll

To the top