A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 May, 2015

Yesterday, I had a privilege to share my thoughts about Bill of Materials and BOM management during my keynote at...

11 January, 2016

One of the fundamental things in product development and lifecycle is related to part numbering schemas. The discussion about part...

23 February, 2020

Recent PLM Stack article – Thoughts about PLM Business Model caught my attention. Check this out here. The last decades...

8 March, 2011

Earlier today, I discovered an interesting company solution called Tigertext. At the time companies are talking about 2D vs. 3D...

16 October, 2021

I’ve been catching up on conferences and virtual events earlier today. One of them was a virtual Autodesk University 2021....

6 August, 2015

The usage of Excel in manufacturing is overwhelming. You might think that Excels and spreadsheets are only used by smaller...

26 November, 2011

Many of the engineers (and not only) are using Microsoft Excel. People are literally lives inside of Excel spreadsheets. When...

10 June, 2014

Notifications are fascinating. We are all love to get notified. Alarms, emails, meetings… Later came social notifications such as likes,...

16 July, 2020

The big news came yesterday – Siemens and SAP announced a new partnership. Here is the link to SAP announcement...

Blogroll

To the top