A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 July, 2018

Back two decades ago, CAD and PLM vendors were competing with ERP for attention of corner suite owners – CIOs...

4 June, 2015

I attended startup event yesterday in MIT. It was organized by by Startup Secrets with participation of Michael Skok and Alex Osterwalder....

12 December, 2021

For the last decade, PLM and information technology have become the foundation for building a competitive edge. PLM expanded and...

14 August, 2020

I wrote about PLM-ERP integrations in the context of the agreement between Siemens and SAP. If you missed my article,...

29 July, 2021

Usually, we speak about how PLM systems help to manage the lifecycle of products. Let’s turn things upside down today...

20 March, 2015

Platform is such a sweet word. We love platforms. In the past, the ultimate dream of every software developer was...

18 November, 2023

Earlier this week I attended Autodesk University 2023. The event back to its regular location Las Vegas Venetian (Sands Expo),...

31 December, 2019

Earlier this month, I shared my thoughts about what happened with PDM for the last 10 years? PDM was an...

29 January, 2009

I was reading an interview with Chris Williams about his new product, Vuuch, on NOVEDGE. Chris said that “the CAD...

Blogroll

To the top