A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic
Oleg
Oleg
6 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I was playing around the data I can take from the website Compete.com. You plug the URL of major CAD or PLM vendor and get the information back for free. I found it interesting to compare. In today’s world online traffic can be one of the important elements of a company marketing strategy. Unfortunately, a free version doesn’t work with sub-domains, so some of the companies were not included into my experiments.

My first test was to put Dassault and PTC. These companies are on the top list also as CAD and mindshare PLM vendors. You can see that their traffic is pretty much compatible. You can see the result online navigating on the following link.

Following my discussion about Autodesk and their potential move into PLM (or MLP) space, my next experiment was to compare mindshare PLM vendors and Autodesk. You can see the result navigating the following link. Now, picture is more interesting. Autodesk and Dassault are companies compatible in terms of revenues. At the same time, Autodesk outperforms Dassault 10 times from the standpoint of traffic.

My last test was to poke one of the PLM challengers. I picked up Aras and tried to compare their traffic with Dassault. Unfortunately, Compete alerted me that aras.com has a low traffic rate. Nevertheless, I found that results interesting. Dassault and Aras are not compatible in terms of size, but their web traffic is pretty much compatible.

What is my conclusion? Few years ago, I was reading the book Numerati, by Stephen Baker. The subtitle of the book states – “the must read for anyone who wants to understand life and business in the Google Age“. If you have some free time during the week, read this book. I think, we are coming to the point of time, when the online influence will be become a critical for company business success. Newcomers can use it as power to enter to the business. Large companies can watch it, in order not to lose their significance tomorrow. Important. Just my opinion, of course. YMMV.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 October, 2014

One of the most prominent marketing slogans in PLM and enterprise software is related to “replacement of Excel”. I have...

5 November, 2021

As COVID hit the world, the PLM industry, like many other industries, made an interesting trajectory from traditional (physical) events...

10 September, 2018

I’m coming to ConX18 conference next week organized by Institute of Process Excellence.  Here is what you can learn about...

1 August, 2016

Autodesk promised to integrated Autodesk Fusion Lifecycle (know as PLM360) with everything. Check my old blog here. Promised as something...

16 April, 2020

Cloud is making big waves these days. A typical cloud value proposition suggests the absence of IT involvement (no installations,...

17 October, 2012

I want to come back to the topic of mobile apps vs. mobile browsers again. Earlier this year I posted...

27 January, 2025

Digital transformation is reshaping the core principles of product lifecycle management (PLM) and enterprise systems at large. Among the many...

1 October, 2009

30 September was time for 100’000 happy individuals to get Google Wave invitation. Even I’m not part of these 100’000,...

17 July, 2013

Excel is one of the most widely accepted PLM systems. PLM vendors and consultants may disagree with this strong statement....

Blogroll

To the top