A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic
Oleg
Oleg
6 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I was playing around the data I can take from the website Compete.com. You plug the URL of major CAD or PLM vendor and get the information back for free. I found it interesting to compare. In today’s world online traffic can be one of the important elements of a company marketing strategy. Unfortunately, a free version doesn’t work with sub-domains, so some of the companies were not included into my experiments.

My first test was to put Dassault and PTC. These companies are on the top list also as CAD and mindshare PLM vendors. You can see that their traffic is pretty much compatible. You can see the result online navigating on the following link.

Following my discussion about Autodesk and their potential move into PLM (or MLP) space, my next experiment was to compare mindshare PLM vendors and Autodesk. You can see the result navigating the following link. Now, picture is more interesting. Autodesk and Dassault are companies compatible in terms of revenues. At the same time, Autodesk outperforms Dassault 10 times from the standpoint of traffic.

My last test was to poke one of the PLM challengers. I picked up Aras and tried to compare their traffic with Dassault. Unfortunately, Compete alerted me that aras.com has a low traffic rate. Nevertheless, I found that results interesting. Dassault and Aras are not compatible in terms of size, but their web traffic is pretty much compatible.

What is my conclusion? Few years ago, I was reading the book Numerati, by Stephen Baker. The subtitle of the book states – “the must read for anyone who wants to understand life and business in the Google Age“. If you have some free time during the week, read this book. I think, we are coming to the point of time, when the online influence will be become a critical for company business success. Newcomers can use it as power to enter to the business. Large companies can watch it, in order not to lose their significance tomorrow. Important. Just my opinion, of course. YMMV.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 February, 2010

I had chance to read yesterday Arena’s whitepaper “Whose BOM is it Anyway?”. You can find the link this whitepaper...

1 July, 2016

PLM has deep roots into process and workflows. You can find pieces of process implementation everywhere – starting from CAD...

9 September, 2010

I had a chance to read AESSIS blog post – Why Some People Don’t Like PLM? Graham started absolutely important...

3 October, 2019

Unless you lived under the rock and didn’t look around for PLM news for the last decade, you should know...

5 February, 2016

The time when you product was a piece of machinery is over. These days, every product is a combination of...

28 July, 2015

The conversation I started yesterday PLM vs Excel: Bullfight and Prohibition made me think again about reasons why Excel is constantly...

27 January, 2018

“Digital” was a big word  last year and I think it will become even bigger trend in 2018. While some...

26 November, 2012

Experience. This word is getting into our lexicon and we start using it often. It is a nice word. We...

27 November, 2011

The announcement made by Dassault System last week, made me think about a huge distance CAD industry passed for the...

Blogroll

To the top