A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic

CAD and PLM Vendor Website Traffic
Oleg
Oleg
6 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I was playing around the data I can take from the website Compete.com. You plug the URL of major CAD or PLM vendor and get the information back for free. I found it interesting to compare. In today’s world online traffic can be one of the important elements of a company marketing strategy. Unfortunately, a free version doesn’t work with sub-domains, so some of the companies were not included into my experiments.

My first test was to put Dassault and PTC. These companies are on the top list also as CAD and mindshare PLM vendors. You can see that their traffic is pretty much compatible. You can see the result online navigating on the following link.

Following my discussion about Autodesk and their potential move into PLM (or MLP) space, my next experiment was to compare mindshare PLM vendors and Autodesk. You can see the result navigating the following link. Now, picture is more interesting. Autodesk and Dassault are companies compatible in terms of revenues. At the same time, Autodesk outperforms Dassault 10 times from the standpoint of traffic.

My last test was to poke one of the PLM challengers. I picked up Aras and tried to compare their traffic with Dassault. Unfortunately, Compete alerted me that aras.com has a low traffic rate. Nevertheless, I found that results interesting. Dassault and Aras are not compatible in terms of size, but their web traffic is pretty much compatible.

What is my conclusion? Few years ago, I was reading the book Numerati, by Stephen Baker. The subtitle of the book states – “the must read for anyone who wants to understand life and business in the Google Age“. If you have some free time during the week, read this book. I think, we are coming to the point of time, when the online influence will be become a critical for company business success. Newcomers can use it as power to enter to the business. Large companies can watch it, in order not to lose their significance tomorrow. Important. Just my opinion, of course. YMMV.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 July, 2026

Last week I attended the IFIP 23rd International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management (PLM26) in Lecce, Italy, hosted by the...

6 October, 2015

Enterprise software customizations are painful. Remember my old post – Is PLM customization a data management Titanic? Nobody likes to customize...

15 January, 2009

For many years, data management was considered as something that burdens the activity of designers and engineers focused on CAD...

24 September, 2017

I spent last 2 days attending Autodesk Accelerate 2017 event. More info is here. The event became almost tradition for...

7 October, 2013

Salesforce.com is well know CRM provider. More than that, Salesforce.com is well know by pioneering SaaS and later Cloud applications....

8 April, 2012

Do you think PLM software must be cool? More than two years ago, I posted FREE and COOL trends in...

12 February, 2010

Recent SolidWorks World Event brought a significant splash of discussion about cloud based applications. It is interesting to see different...

13 October, 2017

Graph is a very powerful paradigm. For many years, the idea of “graph” or “connection” was empowering software engineers to develop...

2 August, 2025

Earlier this week, my attention was caught by Forrester Wave report and debates around this. Thanks for Michael Finocchiaro and...

Blogroll

To the top