A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Autodesk, Russia and Local PLM

Autodesk, Russia and Local PLM
Oleg
Oleg
26 September, 2011 | 3 min for reading

One of the most interesting things I learned during Autodesk Forum in Moscow was related to local PLM vendors.  I found it very educational and decided to share this informtion with my readers. Few months ago Autodesk announced about their plans to develop PLM solutions. You can read my previous blog about that – Autodesk PLM: Fast Second. At the same time, I can see Autodesk is actively partnering with existing companies developing PLM solutions. Earlier, this year Autodesk announced (link) about the partnership with Open Source PLM provider Aras. Appearance of four local PLM companies from Russia on Autodesk Forum in Moscow made me think about what means PLM for Autodesk.

Russia/CIS PLM market is very crowed. It represented by three mind share CAD/PLM vendors Dassault Systems, Siemens PLM and PTC. All of these companies are having their local offices. In addition to that, Russian CAD/PLM vendor Ascon is playing a significant role selling their CAD and PLM solutions. I wasn’t able to find updated information about market numbers. I found the old IDC reports (from 2007) – you can dig for some numbers about vendors’ position in Russia.

I had a chance to see presentations of four PLM vendors announcing and demonstrating their PLM products together with Autodesk.

SDI Solutions

This company is focusing on integration data from multiple data sources. They actually call themselves – MDM (Master Data Management). If you ware not aware MDM (typically implemented for large companies) is focusing on how you can bring data from multiple databases you have in your company to a single “Master” database. You can see it from few slides below. To learn more about the company, navigate to SDI Solutions (in Russian).

Top Systems

TFlex /Top Systems is a company, I’ve been in touch before and had some initial understanding of what they do. In addition to PLM product, Top System is selling 3D CAD product that potentially can compete with Autodesk Inventor. However, on Autodesk Forum Top Systems presented their concept of PLM+ (Russian link) – a system that can cover almost everything in manufacturing company. In a nutshell, PLM+ means “PLM” + everything else. You can take a look on few slides and made your opinion. Their idea of using PLM+ and saving on integration of all other systems is a dominant one. You can learn more by navigating to the following link (in Russian).

Souz PLM

Another system – Souz PLM coming from a company called Constructor.ru (in Russian) The system provides quite a standard set of functionality related to management of 3D CAD data. You can see it on a picture below. One of the things caught my attention was a part of this system focuses on collaborative reviews.

1C / Appius

Company 1C is a #1 ERP provider in Russia. As a local company, 1C is well-known and having a reputation of mainstream vendor with siginificnt Russian customer adoption level. Their PDM/PLM Module provides a standard list of functionality – CAD integration, Versions, BOM, Configuration, Vaulting, Manufacturing, Catalogs, Change Management, Workflow and ERP integration. At the same time, in my view, the marketing focus on this company is clearly about how to up-sell PDM/PLM to existing customers of 1C.

What is my conclusion? PLM companies become recognized members of Autodesk eco-system. The fact almost all local Russian PLM vendors attended Autodesk PLM forum in Moscow is a good confirmation that Autodesk is trying to learn more about PLM. On the global arena, Autodesk just introduced Aras PLM as their Gold Partner member, which is another recognition of Autodesk interest in PLM.  In parallel, Autodesk pre-announced their own cloud PLM offering that expected to come later this year. How all these solutions, companies and strategies will live together is a good question to ask. What is your take? I’m going to share it with you, as soon as I learn more about it.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 April, 2012

Cost is one of the aspects all cloud PLM providers bring to the table these days. The demand and the...

8 March, 2011

Earlier today, I discovered an interesting company solution called Tigertext. At the time companies are talking about 2D vs. 3D...

23 August, 2016

I’ve been catching up on some of my reading follow ups early this week. I found the folloiwng article interesting...

26 June, 2021

Efficiency and productivity are at the core of many decisions made by manufacturing companies. How to reduce the cost and...

2 July, 2009

In one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking...

24 March, 2021

Hexagon’s Article The Digital Thread Comes to BIM brings an interesting perspective on the industrial development of construction projects and...

21 December, 2011

Cost is an important topic. Period. Everybody agrees with this statement. I can even say many companies investing a lot...

15 September, 2010

I had a chance to read SQL vs. noSQL article in Linux Journal yesterday on the plane. I found it...

9 November, 2024

To have an opportunity to discuss specific industry topics is extremely important and rare. We are busy with every day...

Blogroll

To the top