A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Will PLM microservices kill platform dinosaurs?

Will PLM microservices kill platform dinosaurs?
Oleg
Oleg
19 July, 2016 | 3 min for reading

plm-architecture-microservices

Until now we had enough said about “cloud”. While PLM vendors are still disputing what is a true and false cloud, the things are moving forward. Have you heard about “microservices”? You probably should… Because, microservices is one of these things that can give you a better sense about different cloud technologies vs. old platforms hosted on Amazon and Microsoft IaaS platforms.

If you had no chance to catch up on my earlier writing about the role of microservices in cloud application architecture, here are few links to my articles – How PLM platforms will survive in no stack era, Why 2015 will be the year to rethink cloud, How to break limits of existing PLM architectures and CAD-PLM integration and microservices architecture.

Microservices are a more concrete and modern interpretation of service-oriented architectures (SOA) used to build distributed software systems. Like in SOA, services in a microservice architecture are processes that communicate with each other over the network in order to fulfill a goal. Also, like in SOA, these services use technology agnostic protocols.[1]. In contrast to SOA, microservices gives an answer to the question of how big a service should be and how they should communicate with each other. In a microservices architecture, services should be small and the protocols should be lightweight.

For Entrepreneurs Blog by David Skok article Microservices Essentials for Executives: The Key to High Velocity Software Development presents few interesting aspects about how new companies developed microservice based architectures capable to disrupt existing monolithic software stacks.

Among multiple benefits, an increased agility is my favorite:

Increased agility. Microservices empower development organizations to respond much more quickly to market and customer feedback. Whether it’s a game-changing feature or a tweak to make an existing feature eminently more usable, no longer will its release be delayed by the schedule of the single release train. Instead, each microservice can be released independently.

microservices-vs-monolithic-apps

I compared agile microservice architecture with existing well known PLM environments.I think, most of PLM environments to day are still following tight coupling with some elements of centralization. I believe this central element is called PLM platform by most of PLM players. The really interesting thing can happen when existing monolithic applications and platforms will start to decouple. It will change architecture patterns and data integration paradigms.

Platformization is one of the modern trends in PLM software. CIMdata created a dossier about PLM platformizatio here. I’ve heard about that during the last CIMdata vendor forum. Read more on my blog here. Although from CIMdata articles, you can think about Platformization as a business strategy, I wonder what does it mean in terms of technologies and products. How existing PLM products and tools will be transformed into “business platforms”? In my view, the topic is important but controversial. It is going back to the reality of many PLM implementations – a diverse set of tools used by a company in a different areas of design, engineering, manufacturing, supply chain, etc. Agility of microservices can put a technological foundation behind the vision of “platformization”.

What is my conclusion? Existing PLM platforms are going back 15-20 years in the lifecycle of development and multiple acquisitions. These platforms are mostly monolithic application and servers relying on database architecture to store and manage data. One of the biggest problem of existing architectures is move from one product to another or to update existing products. The monolithic application nature makes that problem very painful. New cloud architectures can provide an alternative by bringing a set of microservices and replace existing product with new type of cloud agile platforms. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain.

picture credit David Skok For Entrepreneurs blog 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 August, 2014

Product Data Management (PDM) isn’t a new domain. The first PDM systems were invented 20-30 years ago with a simple...

14 August, 2021

PLM space is hot these days and the money is coming to PLM space. Earlier this year, Autodesk made an...

2 July, 2009

In one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking...

15 September, 2014

The aim of PLM is to improve product development processes and lifecycle. One of the biggest challenges to make it...

6 January, 2016

Who owns product data? Engineering.com article Moving Towards Product Innovation Platforms by Verdi Ogewell brings that question and share some interesting...

30 January, 2019

Digital Twin buzzword is trending and everyone in manufacturing is building some kind of Digital Twin. PLM folks might have...

6 September, 2016

Platforms is one the most interesting trends in the modern enterprise software development. Existing engineering software platforms are trailing long list of...

6 July, 2025

The long July 4th weekend in the US is the perfect time to catch up on some strategic reading. AI...

31 October, 2010

I postponed my monthly writing this month to give few words PTC Creo launch this week. CAD community already started...

Blogroll

To the top