A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 December, 2009

We are very close to the New Year Eve and this is time to come prepared with your wishes in...

4 November, 2020

The era of four digits acronyms is coming. Check out my FLaaS article. If you never heard about LCAP, it...

26 September, 2011

One of the most interesting things I learned during Autodesk Forum in Moscow was related to local PLM vendors.  I...

3 June, 2009

I was reading Josh Mings early this week, “Usable 3D Geometry Please” and thought about many announcements that were made...

19 November, 2023

I’m bringing more notes and insight about Autodesk University 2023 I attended last week. If you missed my earlier articles,...

8 September, 2014

  PLM implementation discussions are usually brings lots of controversy. Vendors, analysts, advisers, service companies, customers are all involved into...

13 October, 2014

  There is one thing that seems make everyone interested and listen carefully these days – online communities. To build...

29 August, 2021

Manufacturing companies are standing in front of an increased level of complexity related to the ways they manage business both...

23 June, 2009

To discover infornmation and search results is always Interesting problem. Especially when you deal with big amount of data. Short...

Blogroll

To the top