A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?

Should PLM Disconnect Data from Process?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read an article byebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware – Cordys is a relatively new outfit in the enterprise software market. The wizard name behind this company is Jan Baan. If you are a long-time citizen in the enterprise software domain, you need his first ERP company – BAAN. These days Jan Baan is very active and Cordys is one of his new babies. In his interview, Jan is discussing his long project related to decoupling of processes. The following quote seems to me interesting:

… ending the data-process dependency is easier said than done. Suppliers attempted it using extremely fat clients at one extreme and sophisticated distributed data with replication at the other.

Process Decoupling

For a very long period of time the concept of “a process needs data” were dominant. Multiple BPM vendors claimed that the only way to make BPM successful is to bring meta-data (and other data) into BPM product suites. I can agree, this strategy seems to be successful if you plan is to create integrated enterprise software suites. However, thinking more about Internet technologies and lean architectures it makes much more sense to make a disconnection of data and process.

PLM: Process vs. Data

In my view, PLM Software vendors are definitely moving towards better vertical integration. Users are asking PLM companies for a better integration between products, and PLM (and not only PLM) companies are starting to couple products and solutions together to ensure customers will spend fewer resources tailoring these solutions.

What is my conclusion? I think, enterprise software vendors can miss the dangerous point of data and process connection and interplay. When most of the enterprise companies use data to lock-in customers in their product suites, the addition of processes seems to them as a natural continuation of this strategy. The real danger of these strategies is a large complicated software products and extremely high cost of changes. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 July, 2021

Last week I attended VPE/PLM Swiss Symposium. The conference was unfortunately postponed from last year and transformed into an online...

15 September, 2020

Differentiation is a big challenge for everyone and it is an even bigger challenge for PLM vendors. The reality of...

21 December, 2010

I’ve been discussing with colleagues Gartner’s Predict 2011: Manufacturer Revamp and Enhance Product Lifecycle Management strategies. Without Gartner’s subscription, you...

11 February, 2014

Open source is a topic that raised many controversy in the last decade. Especially if you speak about enterprise software....

24 July, 2015

In a swift move, Microsoft decided to reinvent email. I guess, many of you had a chance to work with Outlook...

16 April, 2010

Cloud is trending topic these days. During the last few months we had chance to see quite many examples of...

18 August, 2018

My article earlier this week about complexity and challenges of MBSE and PLM models raised a good number of comments...

12 February, 2015

There is a growing number of discussions related to  “platformization” in PLM. Few weeks ago I had a chance to...

25 October, 2016

I’m heading to SolidEdge University 2016 today. Although my attendance there will be focused on openBoM, I will spend some...

Blogroll

To the top