A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturing future will depend on solving old PLM/ERP integration problems

Manufacturing future will depend on solving old PLM/ERP integration problems
Oleg
Oleg
18 March, 2014 | 2 min for reading

plm-erp-mes-smart-manufacturing

How to integrated PLM and ERP? This is such an old topic. I’ve been discussing it on the blog so many times. Here are just few of them – The ugly truth about PLM/ERP integration volleyball, BOM and CAD-PDM-PLM-ERP Integration Challenges, 3 steps how to put PLM / ERP each in their place. The good news – the importance of PLM/ERP integration is well known and recognized by everybody. The bad news – it sounds like not solved problem after all years and attempts.

My attention caught last year Wired article – The ‘Smarter’ Manufacturing Enterprise. Article speaks about communicating between devices and people in manufacturing organization and extended enterprise. The common goal – fast production. Speed and efficiency are two factors that rule modern manufacturing and looks like will be even more dominant factors in the future.

However, every manufacturing today is managed by multiple enterprise systems. Communication and integration between these systems will be a show stopper to make the future smart manufacturing dream into reality. Here is my favorite passage from the article.

Why are serious people talking about this now? Because for the first time, the essential technologies that make it possible finally exist at all levels, across not only the factory, but up and down the entire enterprise. Intelligence permeates every corner of today’s manufacturing enterprise, from the RFID tag on the part, to the machine that moves it on the production line, to the truck that hauls it away. Now the trick is to make all these systems work in harmony as one.

In other words, the fundamental systems of manufacturing — enterprise resource planning (ERP), product lifecycle management (PLM), manufacturing execution systems (MES) and industrial automation—have to operate together, seamlessly, like a single well-oiled machine. 

It made me think again that current PLM/ERP integration model with complicated data synchronization is bad and won’t work for future of manufacturing. It is heavily relies on the idea of data synchronization and replication between systems. It is too costly to implement and maintain. It is sometimes too slow and requires lots of data manipulation and transformation.

What is my conclusion? Previous siloed enterprise models used data ownership as one of the fundamental models. To own data and allow access in a silo (such as PLM, ERP or MES) was one of the first priorities. Today and tomorrow the speed of communication will be more important. To make collaboration and communication fast will be a criteria for future models to survive. For manufacturing companies and PLM vendors today it means one simple thing – to fix old PLM/ERP integration problems. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 June, 2018

Last year I asked in one of my articles – Is PLM business Amazon Proof?  If you run a business,...

9 September, 2012

No, this blog post is not about Dassault 3D Experience. Even more… this post is not about PLM. Last week,...

22 September, 2009

Social PLM. Social Product Development. Social Network and PLM… I think we got lots of such discussion in the past...

15 January, 2009

Even though, 2008 was year of financial crisis and instability, I still regard it as a remarkable year for the...

2 December, 2015

  For the last 15-20 years, PDM and PLM tools went long way from perceived as an-add for CAD tools...

29 May, 2009

I’ve been playing with Microsoft Vine Beta last few days. For me this is sort of contextual collaboration. You can put...

3 February, 2012

If you followed my comments on one of previous posts – Cloud PLM and IT Basic Instincts, I promised to...

8 August, 2012

One of the technological trends I’m observing these days is a trend towards granularity. Speaking about marketing, the word granularity...

6 September, 2012

Cost is important. Period. It drives attention of IT managers and CFOs. With a massive changes cloud and mobile bring...

Blogroll

To the top