A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to increase “Business Process Technology” Adoption Rate for PLM

How to increase “Business Process Technology” Adoption Rate for PLM
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
8 July, 2009 | 1 min for reading

business processOne of the things I see very important is user adoption. We can develop brilliant technologies, but if nobody  uses it, the value of these technologies will be very low. I see Process Technologies as  very important for the Product Lifecycle development… One of the problems I see today is that there is inconsistence between the definition of the Process  and its usage.

I think definition side of “process technologies” works very well. We can define who is doing what and when, how information is flowing and many other details. But as soon as we start this process, many things change. People move, new tasks and changes appear,  and at  the end it’s not easy  to understand  what is going on, how to execute, monitor and manage the changes in this process. Therefore, at  the end, many of processes slap and become  very formal or less usable. So, what can we do in order to prevent it?

I’d propose  three steps that can improve Business Process Technology adoption:

  1. Flattering Processes Definition. A process needs to become more modular, simple and changeable.
  2. Simplification of the User Interface. We need to remove complexity. Simple… Actually,  users need a list of tasks to perform on daily basis and a list of follow up tasks. We need to massively use mobile and other alternative communications and collaboration tools to allow users to follow up the processes.
  3. Flexibility and Change. Changes will come very fast. Life and organizational processes are really dynamic. Process implementation  must allow managing those  changes. It  should be easy-to-make step. We need to be able to re-assign people, change/cancel tasks and to change the process itself. 

So, what do you think?

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 July, 2019

Have you heard about XaaS? Not yet.. You better catch up. Even if you’re not familiar with the buzzword, you...

7 November, 2013

Budget and cost. These are important elements of every IT solution. PLM is not an exclusion from this list. There...

30 December, 2014

One size doesn’t fit all. We know that. Engineers are using multiple tools. Shifting context is complex. For years, CAD...

12 October, 2019

Earlier today, my attention was caught by PLM Stack article – Should you care about the programming language used in...

10 February, 2015

I want to step back and look on PLM development trends for the last 4-5 years. Cloud PLM was one...

19 June, 2009

I’m going back to talking about the CAD interoperability story, inspired by some interesting experience with Google Apps and Microsoft...

21 July, 2010

I read MCADCafe article – PLMIG announces a 10-Year PLM Industry Vision. It navigates you to PLM IG (Interest Group) where...

13 August, 2015

The amount of data around us is growing. The same applies to engineering and manufacturing companies. Our ability to collect...

15 May, 2015

It is hard to sell PLM. Sigh… Even today. Even with all modern open source, cloud, browser, web, mobile, big...

Blogroll

To the top