A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember the time before PLM? Time, when our focus was about CAD and Product Data Management? With all latest developments around Product Lifecycle Management and collaborative business processes, I think we lost some important grounds related to the critical data management issues related to engineering and product development.

CAD and related Design solutions is the biggest source of engineering data produced in the organization. For the last decades CAD and other design-related systems produced huge amount of engineering data – models, drawings, bill of materials, analyzes and more… These pieces of data are very critical to the organization from the standpoint of making product related decisions.

On the other side, product lifecycle management is running forward and shifting focus on how to optimize business processes in the organization. The new PLM solutions is very focused on how to define and run organizational processes related to product design, manufacturing, support, disposal, etc.

But here is the point. I think these two pieces become more and more disconnected. By shifting focus on the process-oriented environment vendors are losing their grounds in data management. Today design and related product knowledge is pretty locked in the systems that used to produce this information. PLM systems are not focusing on how to make this information managed and available inside of the enterprise. The solutions like 3DVIA composer, PTC Arbotext, Autodesk Inventor Publisher are good initial signs, but they are too much focused on geometry and very little on data.

What is my conclusion today? PLM is too much focused on how to capture processes and make it visible on CIO level. It obviously comes from the interest to compete with existing ERP and other solutions. However, on that way PLM is losing some core business related to the ability properly manage product and design data. We need to get back to product management roots and analyze what we still need to accomplish there.

Just my thought…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 September, 2010

Last week I published my visual guide how to choose PLM. This post was the most popular during the whole...

15 March, 2011

Cloud is continuously discussed among the people in CAD/PLM industry. The opinions are varying and discussion is going up and...

1 July, 2010

I have been paying more attention to open source last time. What I wanted to analyze is how Open Source...

4 April, 2012

One of the unpublished rules of PLM Think Tank is not to talk about marketing. Marketing is a tough job....

2 July, 2014

One of the companies I’m following on regular basis is Aras Corp. and its Aras Innovator product. Aras represents an...

26 July, 2010

When I’m thinking about any PLM project, I can clearly see the step when data available in the organization need...

3 May, 2019

Engineering and manufacturing systems are enormously complex. One of the biggest reason is information complexity. An average PLM application is...

29 December, 2014

It is almost a tradition to write a summary of what was popular on the blog for a past year....

6 December, 2019

Everyone needs data. But nobody wants to manage it. I’ve learned it for many years of working with the engineering...

Blogroll

To the top