A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember the time before PLM? Time, when our focus was about CAD and Product Data Management? With all latest developments around Product Lifecycle Management and collaborative business processes, I think we lost some important grounds related to the critical data management issues related to engineering and product development.

CAD and related Design solutions is the biggest source of engineering data produced in the organization. For the last decades CAD and other design-related systems produced huge amount of engineering data – models, drawings, bill of materials, analyzes and more… These pieces of data are very critical to the organization from the standpoint of making product related decisions.

On the other side, product lifecycle management is running forward and shifting focus on how to optimize business processes in the organization. The new PLM solutions is very focused on how to define and run organizational processes related to product design, manufacturing, support, disposal, etc.

But here is the point. I think these two pieces become more and more disconnected. By shifting focus on the process-oriented environment vendors are losing their grounds in data management. Today design and related product knowledge is pretty locked in the systems that used to produce this information. PLM systems are not focusing on how to make this information managed and available inside of the enterprise. The solutions like 3DVIA composer, PTC Arbotext, Autodesk Inventor Publisher are good initial signs, but they are too much focused on geometry and very little on data.

What is my conclusion today? PLM is too much focused on how to capture processes and make it visible on CIO level. It obviously comes from the interest to compete with existing ERP and other solutions. However, on that way PLM is losing some core business related to the ability properly manage product and design data. We need to get back to product management roots and analyze what we still need to accomplish there.

Just my thought…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 March, 2012

What do you think about “PLM Collaboration”?… Yes, I can hear you – boring. However, what if I tell that...

29 April, 2014

Search is a difficult problem. Especially when it comes to enterprise and organization. According to researches, more than 2/3 of...

27 May, 2015

  You can say that buzz around big data is annoying. At the same time, organization are struggling with a fundamental...

4 October, 2017

Do you think your business cannot be cannibalized by Amazon? I wrote about it few months ago – Is PLM...

17 November, 2015

I spent some time yesterday watching Dassault Systemes 3DEXPERIENCE Forum live streaming from Boston. Speakers – Bernard Charles and Monica Menghini of...

20 October, 2014

Workflows and processes. This is an important part of any company. Like blood goes through your body, workflows are going...

3 November, 2016

Change management and PLM implementations are hard. You can check some of my earlier blogs to catch up on the...

21 April, 2016

Business environment is changing fast these days. For years, enterprise and manufacturing were very slow moving segments. Long production programs,...

22 October, 2020

Digital Twin is at the peak of inflated expectation according to ResearchGate publication and it keeps bringing topics for discussion....

Blogroll

To the top