A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Integration Failures

PLM Integration Failures
Oleg
Oleg
12 January, 2011 | 3 min for reading

There is one topic that always raises lots of controversy, in my view. I’m talking about integrations or even more specifically about PLM-oriented integration. I want to point on the following two articles I posted previously about PLM integrations:

PLM Integration Gotchas
PLM and Enterprise Integraton Game

I read Reasons Why PLM Integration Fails?” article on the To-Increase Blog. To-Increase is a company from Netherlands specialized in the Microsoft ERP products (Dynamics AX, NAV) and product configuration software e-Con. Read the article and make your opinion. The author is making point of various difficulties related to PLM integrations. Here is my favorite passage from this article:

A fundamental risk within any manufacturing firm, especially a firm with global operations, is the risk of information becoming siloed within individual teams.  For example, if information concerning a flaw in the development of a product is available only to the engineering team, and kept from marketing, there exists the risk of gearing up product launch tasks too quickly – resulting in wheel spinning at best, and a significant loss in resources at worst.

In much the same way, if a PLM system is implemented – but not integrated with all other systems related to manufacturing processes (think Enterprise Resource Planning systems, think Manufacturing Execution Systems) the risk exists for information to be siloed in one system.

PLM Integration and Competition

The focus on PLM-ERP integration is interesting. These are two systems that very often are trying to establish a dominance in a culture of manufacturing organization. Are you PLM or ERP driven? What system “owns” Part or Bill of Material information? Who is authoring BOM? I heard such statements many times when talked to customers during implementations. The integration point is often becoming a competitive advantage. I believe for To-Increase, integration with other products is a significant competitive advantage. Manufacturing companies would be thinking twice before deciding what system will drive product development processes.

Partners and Integration Complexity

Integration is not a simple task. You need to have enough technological and process knowledge as well as technical skills to make it work. In addition, you can rarely find two identical integration solutions. Each manufacturing company will have their own practices, systems and specifics. Because of such high level of complexity, software vendors are trying to rely on partners to deliver an integration solution for end users.The ability of partner to deliver integration becomes a key in the ability to make an overall implementation success .

PLM Integration is hard. The cost of implementation is high. The cost of failure is even higher. Vendors are pushing integrations out of the scope of their deliveries. Partners, like To-Increase can provide a significant advantage by helping customers to make integration happen. These are realities of ERP and PLM implementations.

What is my conclusion? Integrations are important and complicated at the same time. Integration failures are one of the main sources that can cause overall implementation failure. The reliance on services increases the implementation cost and creates dependency of customers on implementation services. I’d expect software vendors to re-think their view how they can make integration easier. It can be a significant differentiation factor in future PLM systems. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg
Freebie. Nobody paid me to write this article.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 July, 2009

Thinking in loud. I’m looking over many user interfaces of PLM systems and reading “Don’t make me think“. Why every...

10 June, 2014

Notifications are fascinating. We are all love to get notified. Alarms, emails, meetings… Later came social notifications such as likes,...

12 February, 2021

3D EXPERIENCE WORLD 2021 was live earlier this week and I was watching a few sessions. Moving from products to...

26 June, 2014

The race toward efficient cloud sharing of files and other information is heating up. While typical photo sharing application is...

22 February, 2010

I’ve been reading white paper by Kalypso – 4 Reasons Why Industry Leaders Aren’t Losing Sleep. Max Cochet explained four...

29 March, 2017

I’m heading to Ann Arbor later today to attend CIMdata PLM industry and market forum. The event is a first...

24 October, 2014

The number of SaaS businesses is growing these days. You probably had a chance to read my CAD, PLM and...

29 September, 2010

We are in the middle of a very interesting process of digitalizing our life. We are moving more and more pieces...

20 September, 2017

I spend last 3 days with a very interesting group of industrial companies attending IpX 2017: Integrated Process Excellence Symposium...

Blogroll

To the top