A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Integration Failures

PLM Integration Failures
Oleg
Oleg
12 January, 2011 | 3 min for reading

There is one topic that always raises lots of controversy, in my view. I’m talking about integrations or even more specifically about PLM-oriented integration. I want to point on the following two articles I posted previously about PLM integrations:

PLM Integration Gotchas
PLM and Enterprise Integraton Game

I read Reasons Why PLM Integration Fails?” article on the To-Increase Blog. To-Increase is a company from Netherlands specialized in the Microsoft ERP products (Dynamics AX, NAV) and product configuration software e-Con. Read the article and make your opinion. The author is making point of various difficulties related to PLM integrations. Here is my favorite passage from this article:

A fundamental risk within any manufacturing firm, especially a firm with global operations, is the risk of information becoming siloed within individual teams.  For example, if information concerning a flaw in the development of a product is available only to the engineering team, and kept from marketing, there exists the risk of gearing up product launch tasks too quickly – resulting in wheel spinning at best, and a significant loss in resources at worst.

In much the same way, if a PLM system is implemented – but not integrated with all other systems related to manufacturing processes (think Enterprise Resource Planning systems, think Manufacturing Execution Systems) the risk exists for information to be siloed in one system.

PLM Integration and Competition

The focus on PLM-ERP integration is interesting. These are two systems that very often are trying to establish a dominance in a culture of manufacturing organization. Are you PLM or ERP driven? What system “owns” Part or Bill of Material information? Who is authoring BOM? I heard such statements many times when talked to customers during implementations. The integration point is often becoming a competitive advantage. I believe for To-Increase, integration with other products is a significant competitive advantage. Manufacturing companies would be thinking twice before deciding what system will drive product development processes.

Partners and Integration Complexity

Integration is not a simple task. You need to have enough technological and process knowledge as well as technical skills to make it work. In addition, you can rarely find two identical integration solutions. Each manufacturing company will have their own practices, systems and specifics. Because of such high level of complexity, software vendors are trying to rely on partners to deliver an integration solution for end users.The ability of partner to deliver integration becomes a key in the ability to make an overall implementation success .

PLM Integration is hard. The cost of implementation is high. The cost of failure is even higher. Vendors are pushing integrations out of the scope of their deliveries. Partners, like To-Increase can provide a significant advantage by helping customers to make integration happen. These are realities of ERP and PLM implementations.

What is my conclusion? Integrations are important and complicated at the same time. Integration failures are one of the main sources that can cause overall implementation failure. The reliance on services increases the implementation cost and creates dependency of customers on implementation services. I’d expect software vendors to re-think their view how they can make integration easier. It can be a significant differentiation factor in future PLM systems. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg
Freebie. Nobody paid me to write this article.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 November, 2011

Few months ago, I had a chance already to write about so-called “social enterprise”. The term was unveiled and supported...

17 September, 2020

Cloud and SaaS are getting high attention these days of PLM vendors and customers. The interest is driven by many...

22 May, 2021

My last article PLM vs ERP Tug of War generated a great number of comments. Thanks, everyone for sharing your...

10 December, 2009

Some thoughts about Business Intelligence (BI). I found it somewhat under-invested in Product Lifecycle Management field. BI considered as a...

10 June, 2010

An interesting turn in PLM trajectory of Dassault Systems – the acquisition of French based Exalead. With this acquisition, we...

15 April, 2014

Collaboration is the name of the game today for many vendors. CAD and PLM vendors are included. Cloud technology is...

3 November, 2014

Collaboration is fascinating place. So many things were done to improve collaboration for the last decade, but it still remains...

5 August, 2009

Product Lifecycle Management is going full speed to social tools and technologies. With two companies, PTC and DS articulated their...

11 March, 2023

Onshape Live 23, the annual conference organized by PTC Onshape brought together a community of users and everyone who is...

Blogroll

To the top