A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 August, 2020

There is a new cool buzzword in the PLM universe called “low code”. If you didn’t hear about it yet,...

18 May, 2010

Technology and products are not always going together. What is the most fascinating to me is to see how technological...

14 October, 2010

Few days ago I had a chance to speak with Hardi Meybaum of GrabCAD. We spent almost two hours speaking about...

20 January, 2018

In technology world, there is a perception that the company that wins is the one that enters first into the...

12 January, 2017

“Data as a Platform” is one of the most interesting trends to watch these days. I wrote about it in...

6 July, 2017

Engineering.com just published an article confirming that small design and engineering team aren’t interested much in buying and implementing data...

19 November, 2018

Back in 1990s, I was developing my data management applications using AutoLISP and AutoCAD ADS and ARX. For those who...

12 September, 2023

The industrial world is changing and so product lifecycle management (PLM) software. Back decades ago, PLM software was only for...

2 September, 2010

Summer is finally over. This is a good reason to stop talking about fancy social software and cool Apple’s features....

Blogroll

To the top