A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 January, 2021

The modern PLM industry is paying significant attention to the concept of Digital Thread. In a nutshell, a digital thread...

2 May, 2019

One of the most complicated questions when selling PLM is to prove ROI. The topic was debated so much in...

30 May, 2019

Remember a few years ago, we had many discussions about PLM cloud. This is just one example of my article...

8 October, 2010

The following Google Apps Blog caught my attention few days ago – More Tools For Viewing Document Revisions. I found...

9 July, 2012

When it comes to “cloud PLM”, the discussion about “security” is almost inevitable. This is one of the top concerns...

26 October, 2010

Early this week I had a chance to read the following blog post by Accidental Product Manager – Really, Really...

7 September, 2019

One of the most popular discussions in the PLM domain is about what is PLM. The debates are going on...

19 December, 2017

PLM people always had a big vision. How to build a PLM for a whole company. For entire supply chain....

27 July, 2009

I had chance to discuss PLM adoption rate already several time. I think, adoption rate, is one of the factors...

Blogroll

To the top