A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 September, 2010

There are few terms in enterprise software and specifically in engineering software that was completely overused. In my view, collaboration...

26 November, 2019

The first time I’ve got a voice command in the car was 2007. Back those days, my car had a...

27 June, 2008

I’d like to share my view on V6 technologies Dassault Systems presented last week on our technological forum DevCon 2008. If...

11 November, 2022

As the world moves towards more and more cloud-based solutions, manufacturers are looking for ways to take advantage of this...

26 January, 2025

A long time ago, I came across a simple formula for building enterprise software: find a stakeholder in a company,...

1 May, 2019

Every CAD system is using so-called geometric modeling kernel – 3D modeling component. If you want to know what 3D...

21 July, 2010

I read MCADCafe article – PLMIG announces a 10-Year PLM Industry Vision. It navigates you to PLM IG (Interest Group) where...

16 October, 2020

Earlier this week, I was talking to one of my teenage sons about his homework. At one moment of time,...

18 November, 2010

The Facebook announcement about introducing of FB messaging system triggered a flood of posts. I’ve been looking over them for...

Blogroll

To the top