A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
8 February, 2011

Two weeks ago, during SolidWorks World 2011, I had a chance to talk with Jonathan Scott of Razorleaf about different...

8 November, 2017

Platform is the next magic word these days. Everyone is building “platform” these days. Platform is sweet word, which sounds...

26 July, 2016

Almost a decade years ago, I’ve been using HTC phone running Windows mobile operational system. The same one you see...

2 July, 2008

Some thought about how PLM 2.0 technologies will impact future product development communities and processes. Who is winner? My conclusion...

21 July, 2011

The topic of openness in PLM software isn’t new. In the past decade, I’ve been hearing lots of good and...

20 June, 2013

“Hardware is what it is. Software is what it does”. I’ve got this brilliant quote from Dick Morley at COFES...

13 January, 2024

In my earlier article How to bridge PLM and ERP Systems To Support Modern Product Development and Digital Thread I...

8 May, 2015

Traditional manufacturing companies are associated with large manufacturing facilities, manufacturing equipment and significant initial investment to take business off the...

3 May, 2017

One of the biggest challenges for PLM vendors is to extend their product usage beyond engineering applications. Even we can...

Blogroll

To the top