A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 April, 2010

I had chance to post about the issue of complexity in enterprise systems in general and specifically about the complexity...

27 January, 2021

Unless you lived under the rock for the last several years, you’ve heard about SaaSification. This funny term was changing...

20 September, 2019

The weekend is coming and this is a time for some PLM dramas. Engineering.com and Verdi Ogewell is usually not...

9 September, 2012

No, this blog post is not about Dassault 3D Experience. Even more… this post is not about PLM. Last week,...

2 June, 2009

I think that I’m not exaggerating by saying that every conversation about “collaboration” last week started from  the Google Wave...

21 September, 2024

The Product Data Management Software (PDM) business, which started as a way to manage CAD (Computer Aided Design) files, is...

10 November, 2016

Large manufacturing companies have long love and hate relationships with enterprise software technologies and specifically CAD and PLM systems. These...

20 June, 2014

It has been a year since I published my How to select PDM system in 5 simple steps? Engineering.com article The...

26 September, 2012

People are creating ‘chaos’ by the nature of our work. This is a reality in many situations. In my view,...

Blogroll

To the top