A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM, Search and Findability

PLM, Search and Findability
Oleg
Oleg
20 May, 2013 | 2 min for reading

Searching for information is a tricky thing. Search may sounds as a simple operation, but in fact,  it is translated to a complex computational, information and organizational task. Search isn’t a new problem. Lots of work was done in this domain for the last 20 years. Google clearly changed a consumer perception about internet search. Google “lady Gaga” and in less than a second you will have all relevant internet information about Lady Gaga.

However, searching inside of corporate data is different. What works for “lady Gaga” type of search, doesn’t work for MPR-345000 type of search for product information, part numbers, documents in SharePoints, emails, intranet sites and other enterprise data sources. It is complicated and daunting task. Sometimes, it even goes beyond of what is most important – it is about where to search. During my previous work at Inforbix, I found customers are usually very confused about searching information. They think about search as an easy and complicated thing at the same time and usually blame IT for not bringing a right solution to solve the problem of search.

I’ve been looking on materials coming from Enterprise Search Europe 2013 conference earlier this week. looking on Enterprise Search and Findability Survey 2013 published by FINDWISE and presented by Kristian Norling few weeks ago. The following two slides caught my special attention. It speaks about what are the obstacles to find the right information. Take a look on the following statistics:

According to the research, there are top 5 obstacles – we do wrong tagging, we don’t know where to search, tools are not perfect as well as tagging made by tools. The last one is even more interesting – we don’t know what to look for.

What is my conclusion? Information search is a complicated, but fascinating topic. For the last few years CAD and PLM vendors started to put more emphasis in order to improve their way to search and actually find the information. However, solving the problem of a single tool is still not enough. Even if company has PLM/PDM system in place, the information usually located in disparate sources. As we learn from the research, the problem is going much beyond searching for a specific set of keywords – data sources are not defined and how to search for right data is not clear as well. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 October, 2012

I’m in UK these days. Everything is on the wrong side :)… So, I decided to start from an unusual...

15 August, 2011

Business professionals around the world are using SharePoint to organize information and streamline the business processes. I talked with many...

15 September, 2016

Single BOM is such of these topics that usually drives lot of debates. You can catch up on my very...

11 March, 2009

In my view, open source (or more precisely –open source software) is becoming more and more visible in the business...

3 September, 2024

In the last two articles, I discussed multiple aspects of SaaS PLM and cloud architectures. If you haven’t had the...

24 July, 2015

In a swift move, Microsoft decided to reinvent email. I guess, many of you had a chance to work with Outlook...

23 June, 2019

Onshape announced available of their first ever study about product design and development. The study is available online for free....

12 September, 2014

Cloud is getting wider adoption these days. An interesting trend I observe for the last year – customer are asking...

12 December, 2017

For the last few years, Aras made a story in PLM world. Aras was founded in 2000 and had a...

Blogroll

To the top